Zero Carbon, Final Word

Source: Vattenfall

So we have this existential crisis, this looming climate disruption which threatens the habitability of Earth for humans and our fellow species.

We also need to expand access to modern energy supplies across the world to end energy poverty and promote prosperity.

So it’s fortunate we have various alternatives to fossil fuels that don’t emit greenhouse gases when we use them — zero carbon, if you like.

But calling any sort of nuclear energy zero carbon will invariably attract a protest. Mining, milling, fuel fabrication, enrichment, reactor construction, decommissioning and waste management¹ are all listed off as aspects of the full lifecycle which consume energy, often from fossil fuels (mining equipment, grid electricity, etc).

Obviously, many if not most of these aspects apply to all energy sources. It’s the mark of a legitimate commentator to make this observation clearly.

Source: The Conversation²

And while this illustrates average or median estimates, utilities have assessed the footprints of specific nuclear power stations. For example, Vattenfall conducted this sort of life cycle assessment on their Swedish power stations.

“According to the LCA results the total emission of greenhouse gases is about 3 gCO₂-equivalents per generated kWh.”

Are you ready for the twist? Australia’s dominant energy/climate planning work is currently being led by the market operator, AEMO. The Integrated System Plan is mapping out pathways for the orderly replacement of legacy emissions-intensive generators. All of the modelling work uses assumptions such as the below for assessing greenhouse gas trajectories.

Source: Input and Assumptions Workbook (abbreviated for clarity)

Consequently, if modern nuclear capacity was allowed by environmental legislation and included as has been convincingly argued, consistent with these assumptions, it would be counted as zero carbon.

“In reality, the only CO-free link in the chain is the reactor’s operation.

Oscar Archer holds a PhD in chemistry and has been analysing energy issues for over 15 years, focusing on nuclear technology for six, with a background in manufacturing and QA. He helps out at Adelaide-based Bright New World as Senior Advisor (we want your support!)and writes for The Fourth Generation. Find him @OskaArcher on Twitter.




Eco-modernism, clean energy abundance and enhanced opportunity for future generations.

Love podcasts or audiobooks? Learn on the go with our new app.

Recommended from Medium

Proof the World Can Be Green and Stop Global Warming — From a Capitalist

A Brighter Future starts with a better society

Essential reading on biosecurity issues

Protecting the place we call home

100% Reality

10 Easy Changes to Reduce Your Plastic Waste

The climate giant is getting serious about carbon removal

Catastrophe Chronicle — July 2021 Edition

CO2 levels vs Population Growth

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Oscar Archer

Oscar Archer

Eco-modernism, clean energy abundance and enhanced opportunity for future generations.

More from Medium

From one planet, another.

Compensatory Citizenship: Dual Citizenship as a Response to Global Inequality

The environment: the silent casualty of the Ukraine war!

Bridging the Gaps